Having seen first in the remake version of 'restored' to 3am I could not be objective in saying that the refreshed version is better. Unless it is clearly better. The achievement is more fluid while the film is very original, certainly too academic. Janet Gaynor raises difficult enthusiasm while it is a role where you have to give everything to make the public accept this story of naive young girl who becomes a star. Fredric March is very much on his side but we feel that he could give more. Cukor, it gives a real emotional dimension to the story by directing Judy Garland and James Mason.
That said, even without heat made all the key scenes are already in the original film, which allows me to salute a magnificent job of writing from writers. Cukor's version is also much longer, and with the parties 'restored' (the original sound on replacing the lost images photos ...) it is easy to say too long. But the length has just scenes where we see Esther really become a star. Whatever the final answer, in 2 versions, always pulls me to tears, so, again, means a director can not completely cock up a nice script.
PS. Not seen: the re-remake of 1976 with Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson (it feels a little too Streisand calibrated to the vehicle). And it announced a re-re-remake for 2012: a modern version where a seasoned singer (Carla) take him her husband at the top of the charts vendors of soup?
0 comments:
Post a Comment