objectives Metamedia
Metamedia blog takes over from the website that has existed for some years. He wants to foster a better understanding of journalistic practice through the work of analysts, researchers and observers of the journalistic community.
The notion of "journalistic practices" refers to what the media publish or broadcast - and that they do not broadcast to a certain extent - but also to the treatment accorded to information (journalistic genres, direct, sensationalism , fairness, accuracy, impartiality, etc.). and the means to do so (hidden cameras, unnamed sources, etc..).
The exchange sites, observation and rigorous criticism of journalistic practices are rare in the Francophone world, as they bloom in the Anglo-Saxon.
You are invited to share your analysis and research on the practices of journalism. We will be pleased to arrange a storefront without border if these collaborations meet our goals of stimulating a healthy and fruitful debate, rigorous and respectful of the elementary rules of rational argument. Good
passage home!
Monday, January 16, 2006
Monday, January 9, 2006
Green Green Uncensored Online
France 2 and Radio-Canada: two conceptions of mediation
Marc-François Bernier and Hélène ROMEYER
Different mediators exist in the media whether in TV or radio news. The common idea is that these mediators are all more or less heirs to traditions in North America. This article proposes, Through the comparison of French and Canadian cases, highlighting the similarities and differences of two models.
In France, the mediation of writing France 2 works through a program every Saturday after the news. This self-reflexive program call from viewers air their grievances vis-à-vis information and chain advertises a reflection on the responsibility of journalists and / or television message. In Canada, the Ombudsman de Radio-Canada operates more like a journalistic accountability mechanism that receives complaints, analyze and decide on well founded. Its decisions are reflected in an annual report that has changed greatly since 1993: shorter but much more widespread, notably on the Internet.
While some similarities exist between these two models, the differences are more numerous. The study we propose will thus highlight the role and function of these two mediators are not identical: the Canadian model approximating a legal procedure, while the French model is simply an area of debate.
(CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THE COMPLETE ARTICLE)
Marc-François Bernier and Hélène ROMEYER
Different mediators exist in the media whether in TV or radio news. The common idea is that these mediators are all more or less heirs to traditions in North America. This article proposes, Through the comparison of French and Canadian cases, highlighting the similarities and differences of two models.
In France, the mediation of writing France 2 works through a program every Saturday after the news. This self-reflexive program call from viewers air their grievances vis-à-vis information and chain advertises a reflection on the responsibility of journalists and / or television message. In Canada, the Ombudsman de Radio-Canada operates more like a journalistic accountability mechanism that receives complaints, analyze and decide on well founded. Its decisions are reflected in an annual report that has changed greatly since 1993: shorter but much more widespread, notably on the Internet.
While some similarities exist between these two models, the differences are more numerous. The study we propose will thus highlight the role and function of these two mediators are not identical: the Canadian model approximating a legal procedure, while the French model is simply an area of debate.
(CLICK ON TITLE TO READ THE COMPLETE ARTICLE)
French website for analysis, critique and scientific investigation of the journalistic practices.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)