Adds For Church Anniversary

OF vaginitis 2.0

To my surprise, last week I had a yeast infection. I was both worried and happy. My surgeon warned me that it could happen, that I had to wipe my differently than I used to do and maybe some soap or tissue does not correspond to my vagina. Speaking of vaginal flora, under pressure of hormones, two years after vaginoplasty, if you do a vaginal swab in a female biological or with a new wife and we compare the two, we can not differentiate which is which woman. It's really fascinating the human body ... and science. Still, in my enthusiasm and my sense of humor is legendary, I shared this discovery on social media. The reactions were strong and instantaneous. Several women found it very funny, and several so-called manly men were shocked.

I received many emails from women sharing their tips for me fix this as well as many insults to the passage. It even made the headlines of several digital media! It seems there are things we do not talk. It seems to me to be vulgar. It also seems that I am pee-poo. I freely admit to be provocative, I always liked the scabrous humor and it is important to destroy taboos and tough talk about "real issues". What is shocking is not only that I venture to tell the whole world that I had a yeast infection, but I am a new wife, also called transsexual, a transsexual, a man, an ex- guy, a transgenge or shemale. All this according to his understanding of the technical terms of transsexuality, its openness and its respect for others. This episode also opens up a whole section of our perceptions sexist and moralistic.

"A woman would never say it" - a woman

"Because it's just fucking impossible, it just irritated skin, it may not have vaginitis criss! "- Another woman

" You know your bad secretions; it's not smegma SEGMA. RT @ PierreLuc_: After the history of vaginitis, what guys will talk about SEGMA ns? "- A sex therapist to a guy who can definitely not what he's talking

" I would say this: I do not now, and I've never had a yeast infection ... "- Journalist male

Findings of this story

Our society is still closed to talk about the human body and its various natural secretions. Especially if they come from the woman's body. As I have long been a man, I made a transition service and I do not deny having been one, I'll probably wear the odium as worse Transsexual or transgender (which is usually reserved for woman who made a transition to becoming a man and after which we should be called sir) or ex-boyfriend, I might die with a hat article saying something stupid like:

Michelle White born Michel Leblanc is dead today. It is a transsexual who has furthered the cause of transgender people ...



To follow the discussions about Twitter vaginitis (I should say my vaginitis) ...
http://twitter.com/ # ! / search / vaginitis

Sepsis Abscess Of Tooth

The Social Network

I was very skeptical about potential interest The Social Network beyond curiosity about "the film about Facebook." We'll see how the film behaves after the second week of operation, but for now it works fine.

Specifically the film is the idea I was doing a priori. The story itself has absolutely no interest. This tells the script is excellent, the characters are well sketched, the pace is still there, all looking to leave with delicious moments. But without this clever script and great actors (the U.S. will always give us lessons on these points) The Social Network would be very boring quickly.

As I think David Fincher is a filmmaker overrated, a clipper ship who knows the feel of the times but with no artistic sensibility, I go back to that old debate about the illusion of being able to separate the real working writer and through the final result. To indulge in this little game of conjecture, say that Fincher did a great job of project manager based on a great writer puisqu'Aaron Sorkin began his mission before it affects the project director (classic in Hollywood). I do not think the film could be more interesting than that, so I never got the impression that another could have done better than Fincher. Let's say it did a good job on what he asked. From there to rave about the work of making the film ...

I'm tired (not very long ago) when I read these ignorant scribblers pages find cinema as an argument concerning the contribution that Fincher was smart enough not to drown us screenshots of your computer. Duh, it is not stupid either. I say that this is not a great director, but he still knows his job very well. In short, all that to say a name known as a producer that makes these slobbering critics speak, so it converges to the opinion of the film reduces to a good product marketing. A lesser-known director and possibly more talented could do a little better, a little sharper, but it was not the film on his own people wanted to see. In the end I'm sure this film will go into oblivion movies quickly (besides what career may have a product also calibrated on other carriers?). Like all of Fincher's films also there is talk of Se7en, Fight Club of of Zodiac but nothing remains of those movies that came out bluff at the right time and that means more nothing for those who see them again.

my comment hot on IMDb The Social Network for