Screenshot Site BangBangBlog
"Necrophile", "Freak" and "my guys" are just some some of the insults that I use Simon Jodoin past few months already. He also posts a supposed caricature of me by a man shaving , using my photo collage (which did not BangBangBlog use rights and which is in direct contravention of copyright for a media that is not safe. This photo belongs to Olivier Samson Arcand photographer) with a work by Caravaggio (known for his outrageous sexuality at the time, according to Wikipedia ). Simon Jodoin, Andre Peloquin (the editor of BangBang me Pickbone also for months on Twitter) and BangBangBlog also allow an anonymous comment to me saying :
Moral: Michelle White is busting with the suspenders and its referencing if it was not a fairground attraction, one would do anything to fuck her advice internet.
As far as I know, is the property of BangBangBlog Journal See who is known for its openness to diversity of race, orientation, identity and culture. I have trouble understanding that such an institution leaves with impunity its flock , use of such images homophobic breach of copyright and lack of understanding at this point?
On Wikipedia:
Homophobia is hostility, expressed or implied , to individuals whose romantic or sexual preferences involve individuals of the same sex. This hostility is the fear, hatred, aversion or disapproval of homosexuality. Homophobia means so prejudice and discrimination against homosexuals and homosexuality. "Just as xenophobia, racism and Antisemitism e, homophobia is a manifestation arbitrariness of designating the other as not, or less abnormal. "
transphobia (Or Less Commonly, transprejudice and Trans-Misogyny," latter Referring to transphobia directed Toward transwomen) refers to Discrimination Against Transsexualism transgender and transsexual people gold, based On The expression of Their internal gender identity (see Phobia - informal & informal terms prejudice or class discrimination). Whether intentional or not , transphobia Can Have severe consequences for The Target Of The negative attitude. Many transpeople aussi Homophobia experience from People Who Incorrectly associate Homosexuality With Their gender identity. [1] Attacking Someone On The Basis of a perception of Their gender identity Rather The perception of Their Sexual Orientation IS Known as "trans-bashing," as Opposed to "gay bashing."
SHIFT
Bangbang It seems that does not belong to View and is not a division of View in any way, and nobody has to see control over what is published on its pages. However, President Editor View is also a shareholder of the company that controls Bangbang.
Update2
I tried for several exchanges of internal email tool Facebook, to reach an agreement with the president of Editions BangBang inc., Pierre Paquet. We do not however come to an agreement and camped our positions respectively. Mr. Paquet me claimed he had no editorial control over the activities BangBangBlog, although he is president.
According to the register of businesses in Quebec, Les Editions BangBang Inc. majority-owned URBACOM INC.. and its president is Pierre Paquet. Urbacom in turn is owned by several directors including Pierre Paquet is also chairman. Finally, Communications Voir inc. is also owned by Urbacom INC.. and its president is also Pierre Paquet. So, as I said in my first up-to date, does not belong to View BangBang. Both belong to rather Urbacom Inc.. and have the same president. Moreover, they all have the same address, 355, SAINTE-CATHERINE WEST 7TH FLOOR ZIP CODE: H3B 1A5. In summary, when Mr. Pierre Paquet make sure that:
Bangbang is not to see and is not a division of View in any way, and nobody has to see control over what is published on its pages.
I can not, obviously, the word for it.
I also sent a formal notice to Simon Jodoin and Andre Peloquin, commented incriminating in their ticket. They did not publish this comment. Yet they say in their first modified:
We can understand that Michelle White did not appreciate the remarks of Simon Jodoin (which do not relate in any way its orientation sexual). The most basic media ethics is that if it wishes to exercise a right of reply, it is with pleasure that we publish his reply.
Elsewhere on the Web, Mr. Jodoin is also chuckles:
In my view, there are two types of moderation: the first works by exclusion, by the second intervention.
The exclusion is not just not publish reviews.
The second seeks rather to respond to comments in opposing the issue and warning that if the author persists in his foolishness, we will sort the wheat from the chaff in its interventions. In some cases, it even happens that it is others that do.
I personally have always favored the latter. It allows both displays to light some stupidities, to use education (we must explain in each case our disagreements) and gives the benefit of the doubt to players (it is possible to misinterpret them thought). In the case before us here is what I did and got the desired result: the speaker has not persisted. This is what happens most often.
I would answer that a big "Yeah." We flush what suits us and we draped in a shroud of the virgin defending the right to free expression and pedagogy to leave comments (which may have even written himself by using pseudonymity) vile, mean-spirited, irreverent, and homophobic Our Kind, forthcoming.
Further to my notice, the comment was changed, but the image is always despicable. This will be a story to follow, before the press council, the Committee on Human Rights, the courts or of each of these bodies based on the advice of my lawyer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment